That is incorrect, and it hinders uptake of vaccines. “ ineffective” or “ cannot work on everyone.” The Atlantic: ‘Stop Saying Vaccines Don’t Work for the Immunocompromised’ ★īenjamin Mazer, writing for The Atlantic:īut well-intentioned stories on this issue sometimes overstate theĬase, claiming that COVID shots for the immunocompromised are Stanley and $12.5 billion of margin loan commitments from Morgan Said he has $13 billion in committed debt financing from Morgan Musk committed to invest up to $21 billion of his own money,Īlthough this wouldn’t preclude him from cutting back on thatĪmount by bringing on equity partners at a later date. Takeover bid for Twitter, but said that he has secured billions ofĭollars worth of loan commitments from Morgan Stanley. Elon Musk Says He Has the Dough to Back Twitter Acquisition ★Įlon Musk on Thursday disclosed in a federal securitiesįiling that he doesn’t yet have any equity partners on his If the story had come out in 2016 or 2019, it would have blown over as nothing more than a bad breakup. This is the weirdest part of the story - Kotick’s ex-girlfriend effectively had neverminded the whole thing. Included many allegations that were either exaggerated or untrue,Īccording to some of the people with knowledge of the matter. People that the declaration she filed for the restraining order Order ended and the petition was dismissed, according to LosĪngeles County Superior Court records. Three weeks later the matter was removed from the court calendarĪt the request of both parties, and the temporary restraining The woman had initially petitioned for a longer-lasting order, but People familiar with the situation and documents reviewed by the Kotick’s had received a temporary restraining order against himĪfter alleging that he harassed her at her home, according to Its reporting stemmed from 2014 courtįilings it had obtained that showed that an ex-girlfriend of Mr. MailOnline and operates separately from the print publication,
The digital edition of the Daily Mail, which is called the I’m no corporate governance expert but I think if she had called the Daily Mail, on her own, only as herself, it’d arguably have been defensible. Having them do dirty work for a boyfriend at Activision is something else. Having Facebook staffers do dirty work for Facebook is shitty, but it’s their job. Sandberg might be in some actual trouble over this. Street Journal began reporting on the incidents late last year, Whether she violated the company’s rules, according to peopleĬlose to her and to Mr. She wasn’t even involved - only Kotick was.įacebook recently started a review of Ms. Sandberg’s efforts to bury this story are now far more damaging to her reputation than the actual story would have been. It’s a well-worn adage but never more true: it’s the cover-up that does you in. Worried that a story would reflect negatively on her reputation as Public-relations advisers, both inside and outside Facebook, Report on the restraining order, first when they began dating inĢ016 and again around the time they were breaking up in 2019, the Kotick developed a strategy to persuade the Daily Mail not to Working with a team that included Facebook and ActivisionĮmployees as well as paid outside advisers, Ms. Kotick that had been obtained by a former girlfriend in 2014,Īccording to people involved in the article and the campaigns to Revealed the existence of a temporary restraining order against The Daily Mail, which was reporting on a story that would have Sandberg contacted the digital edition of Sheryl Sandberg Pressured Daily Mail to Drop Unflattering Story About Bobby Kotick While She Was Dating Him ★īen Fritz, Keach Hagey, Kirsten Grind, and Emily Glazer, reporting for The Wall Street Journal ( News+ link):
0 kommentar(er)
